← United States · 2018

witharrow.ai/volatility-index/united-states/fcp5-f2bdde708206d49be6b1

Matter of Castro-Tum: Restriction on General Administrative Closure Authority

Validated finding · five-country-2010-20260922-v118-evidence-presentation-fix

CountryUnited States
Operative dateMay 17, 2018
CategoryEnforcement / removal proceedings
Policy toolLegal interpretation / docket management authority
Affected groupNoncitizens in removal proceedings

Policy effect

Overrules Matter of Avetisyan (2012) and Matter of W-Y-U- (2017), holding that immigration judges and the Board of Immigration Appeals lack general authority to suspend immigration proceedings indefinitely through administrative closure, limiting closure strictly to cases where an existing regulation or judicially approved settlement explicitly authorizes it. Phase scope: Applies nationally to all EOIR immigration court and BIA proceedings.

Official source excerpt

Quoted verbatim from the official source below. Ellipses indicate omitted text.

(1) Immigration judges and the Board do not have the general authority to suspend indefinitely immigration proceedings by administrative closure. To the extent the Board’s decisions in Matter of Avetisyan, 25 I&N Dec. 688 (BIA 2012), and Matter of W-Y-U-, 27 I&N Dec. 17 (BIA 2017), are inconsistent with this conclusion, those decisions are overruled. (2) Immigration judges and the Board may only administratively close a case where a previous regulation or a previous judicially approved settlement expressly authorizes such an action.
U.S. Department of Justice, Office of the Attorney General / EOIRMatter of CASTRO-TUM, 27 I&N Dec. 271 (A.G. 2018), Interim Decision #3926Open official source
Retrieved from https://justice.gov/eoir/page/file/1064086/dl?inline=

Review method

Two separate automated exact-claim source reviews

Automated source validation is not independent human legal review. The finding should not be treated as legal advice. Record fcp5-f2bdde708206d49be6b1. Something wrong? Flag this record.