← United States · 2022

witharrow.ai/volatility-index/united-states/fcp5-dd204fb192730c8195c7

Mandatory Frivolous Asylum Adjudication Requirements (Matter of M-M-A-)

Validated finding · five-country-2010-20260922-v118-evidence-presentation-fix

CountryUnited States
Operative dateMarch 11, 2022
CategoryAsylum or protection
Policy toolLegal interpretation
Affected groupAsylum seekers

Policy effect

BIA precedent establishing that when the Department of Homeland Security raises the mandatory bar under INA § 208(d)(6) for filing a frivolous asylum application, an Immigration Judge must make sufficient findings of fact and conclusions of law regarding whether the requirements for a frivolousness determination under Matter of Y-L- have been met, and cannot decline to address the issue. Phase scope: Operative nationwide across all immigration court proceedings and BIA reviews upon issuance on March 11, 2022.

Conditions and exceptions

Validated condition or limit: BIA precedent establishing that when the Department of Homeland Security raises the mandatory bar under INA § 208(d)(6) for filing a frivolous asylum application, an Immigration Judge must make sufficient findings of fact and conclusions of law regarding whether the requirements for a frivolousness determination under Matter of Y-L- have been met, and cannot decline to address the issue.

Official source excerpt

Quoted verbatim from the official source below. Ellipses indicate omitted text.

When the Department of Homeland Security raises the mandatory bar for filing a frivolous asylum application under section 208(d)(6) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1158(d)(6) (2018), an Immigration Judge must make sufficient findings of fact and conclusions of law on whether the requirements for a frivolousness determination under Matter of Y-L-, 24 I&N Dec. 151 (BIA 2007), have been met.
U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration AppealsMatter of M-M-A-, 28 I&N Dec. 494 (BIA 2022)Open official source
Retrieved from https://justice.gov/eoir/page/file/1482556/dl?inline=

Review method

Two separate automated exact-claim source reviews

Automated source validation is not independent human legal review. The finding should not be treated as legal advice. Record fcp5-dd204fb192730c8195c7. Something wrong? Flag this record.

Other United States changes operative in 2022