← United States · 2019

witharrow.ai/volatility-index/united-states/fcp5-8e3aa541d359a44ce9d8

Matter of Thomas and Thompson Attorney General Precedent on Sentence Modifications

Validated finding · five-country-2010-20260922-v118-evidence-presentation-fix

CountryUnited States
Operative dateOctober 25, 2019
CategoryRemoval or readmission
Policy toolLegal interpretation

Policy effect

Overrules Matter of Cota-Vargas, Matter of Song, and Matter of Estrada to establish that state-court orders altering, modifying, or clarifying a criminal sentence are given effect for immigration purposes only if based on a procedural or substantive defect in the underlying criminal proceeding, and not if based on reasons unrelated to the merits, such as rehabilitation or avoiding immigration consequences. Phase scope: Nationwide across all immigration courts, the Board of Immigration Appeals, and DHS adjudications

Conditions and exceptions

Validated condition or limit: Overrules Matter of Cota-Vargas, Matter of Song, and Matter of Estrada to establish that state-court orders altering, modifying, or clarifying a criminal sentence are given effect for immigration purposes only if based on a procedural or substantive defect in the underlying criminal proceeding, and not if based on reasons unrelated to the merits, such as rehabilitation or avoiding immigration consequences.

Official source excerpt

Quoted verbatim from the official source below. Ellipses indicate omitted text.

(2) Such state-court orders will be given effect for immigration purposes only if based on a procedural or substantive defect in the underlying criminal proceeding; these orders will have no effect for immigration purposes if based on reasons unrelated to the merits of the underlying criminal proceeding, such as rehabilitation or the avoidance of immigration consequences.
U.S. Department of Justice, Office of the Attorney GeneralMatter of Thomas & Matter of Thompson, 27 I&N Dec. 674 (A.G. 2019)Open official source
Retrieved from https://justice.gov/eoir/page/file/1213201/dl

Review method

Two separate automated exact-claim source reviews

Automated source validation is not independent human legal review. The finding should not be treated as legal advice. Record fcp5-8e3aa541d359a44ce9d8. Something wrong? Flag this record.